PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMD vs. EMHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XEMD vs. EMHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XEMD vs. EMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
-0.51%13.98%8.77%10.26%1.82%
EMHC
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
-1.69%14.07%3.52%10.06%3.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than EMHC's -1.69% return.


XEMD

1D
0.83%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
10Y*

EMHC

1D
0.81%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
1.67%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XEMD vs. EMHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHC's 0.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XEMD vs. EMHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EMHC
EMHC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD vs. EMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMDEMHCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.38

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

2.01

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.18

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.23

8.84

+4.39

XEMD vs. EMHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the EMHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and EMHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEMDEMHCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.38

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.15

+1.16

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and EMHC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XEMD vs. EMHC - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than EMHC's 6.33% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
6.10%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%0.00%
EMHC
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
6.33%6.16%5.95%5.12%5.11%2.97%

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. EMHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum EMHC drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and EMHC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMDEMHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-28.03%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-4.37%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-3.44%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-10.22%

+8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.08%

-0.26%

Volatility

XEMD vs. EMHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 2.43%, while SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XEMDEMHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.75%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

3.85%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

6.76%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

9.05%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

9.05%

-2.11%