PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XEMD vs. BBDD.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XEMDBBDD.L
YTD Return9.15%24.01%
1Y Return15.53%30.64%
Sharpe Ratio2.802.60
Sortino Ratio4.203.78
Omega Ratio1.541.51
Calmar Ratio6.124.47
Martin Ratio20.0617.54
Ulcer Index0.79%1.72%
Daily Std Dev5.66%11.56%
Max Drawdown-10.01%-25.72%
Current Drawdown-0.31%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between XEMD and BBDD.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than BBDD.L's 24.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.80%
14.97%
XEMD
BBDD.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BBDD.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for XEMD: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%
Expense ratio chart for BBDD.L: current value at 0.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 5.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XEMD, currently valued at 17.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.90
BBDD.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BBDD.L, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BBDD.L, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BBDD.L, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.56
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BBDD.L, currently valued at 4.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BBDD.L, currently valued at 17.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.84

XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and BBDD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.59
2.89
XEMD
BBDD.L

Dividends

XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, while BBDD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
6.19%6.19%3.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum BBDD.L drawdown of -25.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and BBDD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.31%
0
XEMD
BBDD.L

Volatility

XEMD vs. BBDD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 1.54%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.54%
3.33%
XEMD
BBDD.L