XEMD vs. GABF
XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. XEMD is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEMD returned 10.14%/yr vs 18.82%/yr for GABF. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XEMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
XEMD vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -1.93% return.
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
GABF
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $95.56K | $89.02K | $204.10K | |
| $5.44M | $11.46M | $8.01M |
XEMD vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.49% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 2.40% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -1.93% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | 4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEMD and GABF is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEMD vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
XEMD
GABF
XEMD vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEMD | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.97 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.26 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | -0.56 | +11.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEMD vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEMD | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -20.86% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -17.16% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.23% | -20.86% | +16.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -6.75% | +5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -4.97% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 7.90% | -7.09% |
Volatility
XEMD vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) is 0.96%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that XEMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEMD | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 4.51% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | 13.17% | -9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 17.57% | -12.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 20.37% | -13.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 20.37% | -13.57% |
XEMD vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEMD vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than GABF's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.00% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.24% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEMD and GABF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 18.82% vs 10.14% for XEMD. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, XEMD has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 2.00% for GABF.
XEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XEMD and 0.10% for GABF.
XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XEMD and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer