PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WZRD vs. UNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WZRD vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -84.25% return, which is significantly lower than UNOV's 6.17% return.


WZRD

1D
18.84%
1M
-45.82%
6M
-82.64%
YTD
-84.25%
1Y
-86.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UNOV

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.52%
6M
5.31%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
11.46%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WZRD vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and UNOV is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WZRD vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WZRD
WZRD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
WZRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WZRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
WZRD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
WZRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
WZRD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WZRD vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WZRDUNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.65

1.39

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

2.54

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.06

12.08

-14.14

WZRD vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WZRD Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WZRD and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -91.23%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and UNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WZRDUNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.23%

-13.84%

-77.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.23%

-4.52%

-86.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.21%

-0.15%

-87.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-1.64%

-29.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.83%

0.95%

+40.88%

Volatility

WZRD vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 63.62% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.48%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WZRDUNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

63.62%

1.48%

+62.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.11%

4.98%

+73.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.16%

5.78%

+73.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.46%

6.89%

+70.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.46%

7.70%

+69.76%

WZRD vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

WZRD vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


WZRD and UNOV have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WZRD has higher volatility (63.62%) compared to UNOV (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -91.23% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

On 1-year performance, UNOV leads with 11.46% vs -86.32% for WZRD. On fees, UNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UNOV has performed better with a 11.46% return vs -86.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UNOV is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.79% for UNOV.

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WZRD and UNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer