PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNOV vs. FTAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNOV vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 11.34% return.


UNOV

1D
0.67%
1M
1.37%
6M
5.74%
YTD
6.92%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.08%

FTAG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.29%
6M
2.71%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
5.38%
ALL TIME*
-8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$83.54K$68.71K$180.75K
$167.14K$174.47K$1.54M

UNOV vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
6.92%9.92%9.42%14.18%-6.23%4.45%8.31%1.87%
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
11.34%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%13.88%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UNOV and FTAG is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019

0.45

The correlation between UNOV and FTAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UNOV vs. FTAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UNOV
FTAG

Technology

37.9%

-

Financial Services

11.7%

-

Communication Services

10.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
4.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
10.0%

Industrials

8.4%
25.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.6%

Energy

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
52.5%

Technology

UNOV
37.9%
FTAG

-

Financial Services

UNOV
11.7%
FTAG

-

Communication Services

UNOV
10.0%
FTAG

-

Consumer Cyclical

UNOV
9.6%
FTAG
4.5%

Healthcare

UNOV
9.1%
FTAG
10.0%

Industrials

UNOV
8.4%
FTAG
25.4%

Consumer Defensive

UNOV
4.6%
FTAG
7.6%

Energy

UNOV
3.0%
FTAG

-

Utilities

UNOV
2.3%
FTAG

-

Real Estate

UNOV
1.9%
FTAG

-

Basic Materials

UNOV
1.7%
FTAG
52.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNOV vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UNOV vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNOVFTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.17

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.37

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

3.00

+9.59

UNOV vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNOV and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNOV vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and FTAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNOVFTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-90.89%

+77.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-9.56%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-20.74%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

-32.77%

+23.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-78.47%

+78.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-71.30%

+69.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

4.34%

-3.38%

Volatility

UNOV vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) is 2.02%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that UNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNOVFTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.64%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

11.24%

-6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.01%

14.28%

-8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

17.42%

-10.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

19.45%

-11.75%

UNOV vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNOV vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.31%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNOV and FTAG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to UNOV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNOV dropped -13.84% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

On 5-year performance, UNOV leads with 6.86% vs 1.91% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UNOV has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

UNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index, while FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UNOV and 0.70% for FTAG.

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNOV and FTAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer