PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WZRD vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WZRD vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -95.64% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 5.06% return.


WZRD

1D
-24.11%
1M
-66.67%
6M
-94.79%
YTD
-95.64%
1Y
-96.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-95.20%

BUFX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.68%
6M
4.54%
YTD
5.06%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$98.01K$102.06K$119.53K
$53.22K$31.27K$34.05K

WZRD vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and BUFX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WZRD vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WZRD
WZRD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
WZRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WZRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
WZRD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
WZRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
WZRD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WZRD vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WZRDBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.54

1.49

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

3.28

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.09

19.17

-21.26

WZRD vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WZRD Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WZRD and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WZRDBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.46%

-2.87%

-93.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.46%

-2.87%

-93.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.46%

0.00%

-96.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-0.24%

-32.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.06%

0.49%

+45.57%

Volatility

WZRD vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 70.52% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 0.99%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WZRDBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

70.52%

0.99%

+69.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.00%

3.45%

+95.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.72%

4.10%

+92.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.69%

3.96%

+88.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.69%

3.96%

+88.73%

WZRD vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

WZRD vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


WZRD and BUFX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WZRD has higher volatility (70.52%) compared to BUFX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -96.46% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

On 1-year performance, BUFX leads with 9.79% vs -96.34% for WZRD. On fees, BUFX is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFX has performed better with a 9.79% return vs -96.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUFX is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 29.54%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.96% for BUFX.

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WZRD and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer