PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNOV vs. HCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UNOV vs. HCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UNOV vs. HCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
-2.07%9.92%9.42%3.92%
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
-8.58%7.39%39.14%5.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than HCMT's -8.58% return.


UNOV

1D
1.34%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*

HCMT

1D
-0.03%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
-8.58%
6M
-5.95%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UNOV vs. HCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMT's 1.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UNOV vs. HCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

HCMT
HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNOV vs. HCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNOVHCMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

0.58

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

0.91

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

0.89

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.24

2.48

+5.76

UNOV vs. HCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the HCMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNOV and HCMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNOVHCMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.58

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.49

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between UNOV and HCMT is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UNOV vs. HCMT - Dividend Comparison

UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


Drawdowns

UNOV vs. HCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum HCMT drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and HCMT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UNOVHCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-36.26%

+22.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-19.31%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-13.50%

+10.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-8.33%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

6.93%

-5.72%

Volatility

UNOV vs. HCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) is 2.74%, while Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that UNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UNOVHCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

7.70%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

20.08%

-15.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

29.73%

-21.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

29.03%

-22.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.77%

29.03%

-21.26%