WZRD vs. CNAV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WZRD returned -96.34% vs 39.18% for CNAV. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

WZRD vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -95.64% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 24.51% return.

WZRD

• 1D: -24.11%
• 1M: -66.67%
• 6M: -94.79%
• YTD: -95.64%
• 1Y: -96.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -95.20%

CNAV

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -10.01%
• 6M: 18.26%
• YTD: 24.51%
• 1Y: 39.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	$249.12K	$293.43K	$339.76K
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	$53.22K	$31.27K	$34.05K

WZRD vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	-95.64%	-18.13%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	24.51%	16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and CNAV is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

WZRD vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WZRD

WZRD Risk / Return Rank: 0
WZRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WZRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 44
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WZRD vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WZRD	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	1.06	-2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.21	1.53	-4.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.54	1.20	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	1.40	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.09	6.25	-8.33

WZRD vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WZRD Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WZRD and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than CNAV's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	WZRD	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.46%	-30.06%	-66.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.46%	-25.80%	-70.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.46%	-20.15%	-76.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-5.84%	-27.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.06%	5.79%	+40.27%

Volatility

WZRD vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 70.52% compared to Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) at 15.97%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WZRD	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	70.52%	15.97%	+54.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	99.00%	31.59%	+67.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.72%	34.30%	+62.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.69%	31.45%	+61.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.69%	31.45%	+61.24%

WZRD vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

WZRD vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	29.54%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WZRD and CNAV in my portfolio?

WZRD and CNAV have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WZRD or CNAV?

WZRD has higher volatility (70.52%) compared to CNAV (15.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -96.46% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, WZRD or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 39.18% vs -96.34% for WZRD. On fees, WZRD is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, CNAV has been the lower-risk option at 15.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WZRD or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 39.18% return vs -96.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WZRD or CNAV?

WZRD is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WZRD or CNAV?

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 29.54%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between WZRD and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.