PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WZRD vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WZRD vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -74.01% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 36.79% return.


WZRD

1D
1.73%
1M
-25.12%
YTD
-74.01%
6M
-74.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
36.79%
6M
36.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WZRD vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WZRD
Opportunistic Trader ETF
-74.01%-10.73%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
36.79%37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and AFOS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WZRD vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WZRD vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WZRDAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-11.52%

-67.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.89%

0.00%

-78.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.85%

-1.41%

-25.44%

Volatility

WZRD vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WZRDAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.33%

21.17%

+35.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.33%

21.17%

+35.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.33%

21.17%

+35.16%

WZRD vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WZRD vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%
WZRD
Opportunistic Trader ETF
4.95%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


WZRD and AFOS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WZRD and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer