UNOV vs. XMAG
UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - UNOV tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index while XMAG tracks the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UNOV returned 13.21% vs 24.07% for XMAG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
UNOV vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 13.10% return.
UNOV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- 1Y
- 13.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 5.62% | 9.92% | 1.85% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 13.10% | 15.63% | -1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNOV and XMAG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between UNOV and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
UNOV vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UNOV
XMAG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UNOV
XMAG
Financial Services
UNOV
XMAG
Communication Services
UNOV
XMAG
Consumer Cyclical
UNOV
XMAG
Healthcare
UNOV
XMAG
Industrials
UNOV
XMAG
Consumer Defensive
UNOV
XMAG
Energy
UNOV
XMAG
Utilities
UNOV
XMAG
Real Estate
UNOV
XMAG
Basic Materials
UNOV
XMAG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNOV vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
UNOV
XMAG
UNOV vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNOV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.32 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.07 | 14.61 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNOV vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum XMAG drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNOV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -16.17% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -7.29% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.70% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -2.10% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.65% | -0.71% |
Volatility
UNOV vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) is 1.86%, while Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that UNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNOV | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.86% | 4.19% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | 9.23% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.74% | 11.63% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 15.21% | -8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 15.21% | -7.49% |
UNOV vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNOV vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNOV and XMAG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMAG has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to UNOV (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNOV dropped -13.84% vs XMAG's -16.17%.
On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.07% vs 13.21% for UNOV. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.
XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.
UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index, while XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UNOV and 0.35% for XMAG.
UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNOV and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer