WZRD vs. BDGS
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
WZRD vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -74.01% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 4.55% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -25.12%
- YTD
- -74.01%
- 6M
- -74.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 12.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WZRD vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -74.01% | -18.13% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 4.55% | 6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and BDGS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDGS
WZRD vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WZRD | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.25% | -9.12% | -70.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.89% | -1.84% | -77.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.85% | -0.66% | -26.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.33% | 6.38% | +49.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.33% | 8.23% | +48.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.33% | 8.23% | +48.10% |
WZRD vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 4.95% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and BDGS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.
They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.87% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer