WZRD vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

WZRD vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -74.01% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.78% return.

WZRD

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -25.12%
• YTD: -74.01%
• 6M: -74.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 18.78%
• 6M: 18.51%
• 1Y: 45.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WZRD vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	-74.01%	-18.13%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	18.78%	18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and BLCR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

WZRD vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WZRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WZRD vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WZRD	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.64	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.00	—

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	WZRD	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.25%	-21.29%	-57.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.89%	-1.02%	-77.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.85%	-2.19%	-24.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WZRD	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.33%	16.38%	+39.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.33%	17.65%	+38.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.33%	17.65%	+38.68%

WZRD vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

WZRD vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.28%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	4.95%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WZRD and BLCR in my portfolio?

WZRD and BLCR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WZRD or BLCR?

On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WZRD or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WZRD or BLCR?

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.28% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between WZRD and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.36% for BLCR.