WZRD vs. BLCR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WZRD returned -96.34% vs 32.42% for BLCR. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

WZRD vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -95.64% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.00% return.

WZRD

• 1D: -24.11%
• 1M: -66.67%
• 6M: -94.79%
• YTD: -95.64%
• 1Y: -96.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -95.20%

BLCR

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: 12.15%
• YTD: 15.00%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	$18.05M	$18.88M	$32.16M
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	$53.22K	$31.27K	$34.05K

WZRD vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	-95.64%	-18.13%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	15.00%	18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and BLCR is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

WZRD vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WZRD

WZRD Risk / Return Rank: 0
WZRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WZRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 79
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WZRD vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WZRD	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	1.78	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.21	2.47	-5.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.54	1.30	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	2.99	-3.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.09	11.94	-14.02

WZRD vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WZRD Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WZRD and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	WZRD	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.46%	-21.29%	-75.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.46%	-10.26%	-86.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.46%	-4.18%	-92.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-2.24%	-30.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.06%	2.56%	+43.50%

Volatility

WZRD vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 70.52% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) at 5.68%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WZRD	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	70.52%	5.68%	+64.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	99.00%	13.89%	+85.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.72%	17.19%	+79.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.69%	17.71%	+74.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.69%	17.71%	+74.98%

WZRD vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

WZRD vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, more than BLCR's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	29.54%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WZRD and BLCR in my portfolio?

WZRD and BLCR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WZRD or BLCR?

WZRD has higher volatility (70.52%) compared to BLCR (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -96.46% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, WZRD or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 32.42% vs -96.34% for WZRD. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BLCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WZRD or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 32.42% return vs -96.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WZRD or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WZRD or BLCR?

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 29.54%, compared with 0.29% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between WZRD and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.