WZRD vs. SPTM
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, WZRD returned -78.95% vs 22.61% for SPTM. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
WZRD vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -74.28% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 8.68% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -25.90%
- YTD
- -74.28%
- 6M
- -74.51%
- 1Y
- -78.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 8.68%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
WZRD vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -74.28% | -18.13% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 8.68% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and SPTM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPTM
WZRD vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WZRD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -79.82%, which is greater than SPTM's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.82% | -54.80% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.82% | -8.68% | -71.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.11% | -2.83% | -76.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.27% | -9.03% | -18.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.38% | 12.48% | +43.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.38% | 16.96% | +39.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.38% | 18.04% | +38.34% |
WZRD vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than SPTM's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 5.01% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and SPTM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, SPTM leads with 22.61% vs -78.95% for WZRD. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 22.61% return vs -78.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.08% for SPTM.
They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer