WZRD vs. SPTM
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
WZRD vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -61.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.57% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- -61.76%
- 6M
- -65.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
WZRD vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -61.76% | -10.73% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.57% | 12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and SPTM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
SPTM
WZRD vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WZRD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.35 | 0.46 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -71.81%, which is greater than SPTM's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.81% | -54.80% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.95% | -0.25% | -68.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -9.05% | -14.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 11.87% | +38.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 16.86% | +33.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 18.03% | +32.59% |
WZRD vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than SPTM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 3.37% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and SPTM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.03% for SPTM.
They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer