SPTM vs. BKLC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index while BKLC tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPTM returned 13.15%/yr vs 13.82%/yr for BKLC. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPTM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKLC.

Performance

SPTM vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPTM having a 10.17% return and BKLC slightly lower at 9.77%.

SPTM

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 26.81%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 15.51%

BKLC

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 22.14%
• 5Y*: 13.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTM vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	10.17%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	39.48%
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF	9.77%	18.06%	25.56%	30.88%	-20.52%	27.41%	37.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and BKLC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020	0.97

The correlation between SPTM and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTM vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPTM	BKLC
Technology	37.4%	38.8%
Financial Services	11.4%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Communication Services	10.0%	10.9%
Industrials	8.9%	8.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.4%
Energy	3.3%	3.2%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.7%
Utilities	2.1%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SPTM vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 69
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BKLC

BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 66
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTM vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPTM	BKLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.11	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.82	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	2.95	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.03	13.05	+0.98

SPTM vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and BKLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and BKLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTM	BKLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.80%	-26.14%	-28.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-9.10%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.87%	-19.05%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.14%	-26.14%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-1.78%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-5.24%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.06%	-0.14%

Volatility

SPTM vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPTM	BKLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	4.83%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	10.00%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.46%	12.77%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	17.27%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	17.47%	+0.61%

SPTM vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPTM vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than BKLC's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF	1.02%	1.05%	1.22%	1.35%	1.64%	1.10%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.33%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTM and BKLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, SPTM and BKLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPTM or BKLC?

BKLC has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to SPTM (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs BKLC's -26.14%.

Which ETF is better, SPTM or BKLC?

On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 13.82% vs 13.15% for SPTM. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPTM or BKLC?

Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 13.82% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTM or BKLC?

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SPTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTM or BKLC?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.02% for BKLC.

What is the main difference between SPTM and BKLC?

SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.00% for BKLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.