PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPTM having a 10.17% return and VTI slightly higher at 10.35%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPTM having a 15.51% annualized return and VTI not far behind at 15.31%.


SPTM

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.30%
YTD
10.17%
6M
9.53%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
15.51%

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.17%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTM and VTI is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.95

The correlation between SPTM and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTM
VTI

Technology

37.4%
37.0%

Financial Services

11.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.7%

Communication Services

10.0%
9.8%

Industrials

8.9%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.3%

Energy

3.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.9%

Technology

SPTM
37.4%
VTI
37.0%

Financial Services

SPTM
11.4%
VTI
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTM
10.1%
VTI
9.7%

Communication Services

SPTM
10.0%
VTI
9.8%

Industrials

SPTM
8.9%
VTI
9.4%

Healthcare

SPTM
8.4%
VTI
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPTM
4.4%
VTI
4.3%

Energy

SPTM
3.3%
VTI
3.3%

Real Estate

SPTM
2.2%
VTI
2.3%

Utilities

SPTM
2.1%
VTI
2.1%

Basic Materials

SPTM
1.9%
VTI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTMVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.06

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.03

13.68

+0.35

SPTM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-55.45%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.92%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-19.30%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-25.36%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-35.00%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.48%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-8.01%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.99%

-0.07%

Volatility

SPTM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.74%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

9.96%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

12.76%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.49%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

18.35%

-0.27%

SPTM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPTM and VTI have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.07%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SPTM and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to SPTM (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 15.51% vs 15.31% for VTI. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 15.51% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM and VTI have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.02% for VTI.

SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer