SPTM vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
SPTM and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both SPTM and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPTM or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| SPTM | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.82% | 2.57% |
| 1Y Return | 24.55% | 11.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.93% | 4.72% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.14% | 11.37% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.24% | 11.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.29 | 1.12 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.76% | 11.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -54.80% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.99% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTM and SCHD is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPTM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 2.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTM has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 12.24%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPTM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPTM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPTM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SCHD's 3.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.38% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.45% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
SPTM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPTM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.