SPTM vs. SCHD
SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPTM returned 14.86%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SCHD. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPTM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
SPTM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTM achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTM has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.86%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.78%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M | |
| $40.04M | $39.69M | $45.49M |
SPTM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 10.61% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 21.18% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTM and SCHD is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPTM and SCHD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPTM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPTM
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SPTM
SCHD
Financial Services
SPTM
SCHD
Healthcare
SPTM
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
SPTM
SCHD
Industrials
SPTM
SCHD
Communication Services
SPTM
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
SPTM
SCHD
Energy
SPTM
SCHD
Utilities
SPTM
SCHD
Real Estate
SPTM
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
SPTM
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
SPTM
SCHD
SPTM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.51 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 6.74 | -4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 17.01 | -6.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTM drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.80% | -33.37% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -4.61% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -16.13% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | -16.85% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | -33.37% | -1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.24% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -3.30% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.82% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SPTM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is 3.50%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that SPTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 4.11% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 8.11% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 11.13% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 14.39% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 16.72% | +1.31% |
SPTM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPTM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPTM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SPTM (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTM dropped -54.80% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 14.86% vs 12.76% for SCHD. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.06% for SPTM.
SPTM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPTM and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer