WZRD vs. FTIF
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, WZRD returned -78.95% vs 28.27% for FTIF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
WZRD vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -74.28% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 20.08% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -25.90%
- YTD
- -74.28%
- 6M
- -74.51%
- 1Y
- -78.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTIF
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 20.08%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WZRD vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -74.28% | -18.13% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 20.08% | 6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and FTIF is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTIF
WZRD vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WZRD | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -79.82%, which is greater than FTIF's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.82% | -27.83% | -51.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.82% | -5.46% | -74.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.11% | -5.03% | -74.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.27% | -5.95% | -21.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.38% | 15.40% | +40.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.38% | 18.91% | +37.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.38% | 18.91% | +37.47% |
WZRD vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than FTIF's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 5.01% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and FTIF have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 28.27% vs -78.95% for WZRD. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 28.27% return vs -78.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.16% for FTIF.
They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.60% for FTIF.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer