PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIF vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIF vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 12.61% return.


FTIF

1D
-0.96%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
20.97%
6M
19.74%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-3.23%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.52%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIF vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTIF and QDTE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.44

FTIF vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTIF
QDTE

Energy

38.0%

-

Basic Materials

22.0%

-

Industrials

18.0%

-

Real Estate

14.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Technology

2.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

5.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

FTIF
38.0%
QDTE

-

Basic Materials

FTIF
22.0%
QDTE

-

Industrials

FTIF
18.0%
QDTE

-

Real Estate

FTIF
14.0%
QDTE

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTIF
4.0%
QDTE

-

Technology

FTIF
2.0%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

FTIF

-

QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

FTIF

-

QDTE

-

Financial Services

FTIF

-

QDTE
5.4%

Healthcare

FTIF

-

QDTE

-

Utilities

FTIF

-

QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIF vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIF vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIFQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

3.31

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

12.82

+2.41

FTIF vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIF and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTIF vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIFQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-22.86%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-10.20%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-3.55%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.13%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.63%

-0.67%

Volatility

FTIF vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is 4.57%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that FTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIFQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

8.57%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

13.32%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

16.68%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.99%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.99%

-0.07%

FTIF vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTIF vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than QDTE's 44.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.15%1.45%2.88%1.55%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.23%49.49%32.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTIF and QDTE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTE has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to FTIF (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 33.64% vs 29.74% for FTIF. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 33.64% return vs 29.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.23%, compared with 1.15% for FTIF.

FTIF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTIF and 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIF and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer