PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIF vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIF vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 24.04% return, which is significantly higher than MTUM's 19.93% return.


FTIF

1D
0.18%
1M
4.50%
6M
14.08%
YTD
24.04%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.94%

MTUM

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.35%
6M
17.31%
YTD
19.93%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.71%
ALL TIME*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$126.29K$72.10K$61.82K
$558.09M$637.73M$538.11M

FTIF vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
24.04%7.79%0.50%12.31%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
19.93%22.15%32.89%17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIF and MTUM is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023

0.50

The correlation between FTIF and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTIF vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTIF
MTUM

Energy

39.0%
11.5%

Basic Materials

20.6%
2.2%

Industrials

18.2%
12.1%

Real Estate

13.8%
1.5%

Technology

4.4%
48.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
3.0%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

5.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

3.7%

Energy

FTIF
39.0%
MTUM
11.5%

Basic Materials

FTIF
20.6%
MTUM
2.2%

Industrials

FTIF
18.2%
MTUM
12.1%

Real Estate

FTIF
13.8%
MTUM
1.5%

Technology

FTIF
4.4%
MTUM
48.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTIF
4.0%
MTUM
3.0%

Communication Services

FTIF

-

MTUM
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTIF

-

MTUM
3.7%

Financial Services

FTIF

-

MTUM
5.2%

Healthcare

FTIF

-

MTUM
4.2%

Utilities

FTIF

-

MTUM
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIF vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTIF vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIFMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

1.40

+3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.19

5.72

+8.47

FTIF vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIF Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIF and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTIF vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIFMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-34.08%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-17.99%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

-20.99%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-13.22%

+11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-6.22%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

4.39%

-2.19%

Volatility

FTIF vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is 2.73%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that FTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIFMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

11.22%

-8.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

23.33%

-12.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

25.53%

-10.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

21.89%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

21.72%

-2.99%

FTIF vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTIF vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than MTUM's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.08%1.45%2.88%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.62%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTIF and MTUM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to FTIF (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 27.89% vs 10.74% for FTIF. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 27.89% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.62% for MTUM.

FTIF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTIF and 0.15% for MTUM.

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIF and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer