FTIF vs. FTAG
FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from First Trust - FTIF tracks the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross while FTAG tracks the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTIF returned 14.45%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for FTAG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTIF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.
Performance
FTIF vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly higher than FTAG's 8.00% return.
FTIF
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 22.14%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
FTIF vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 22.14% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 8.00% | 14.82% | -6.72% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTIF and FTAG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FTIF and FTAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTIF vs. FTAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTIF
FTAG
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
FTIF
FTAG
-
Basic Materials
FTIF
FTAG
Industrials
FTIF
FTAG
Real Estate
FTIF
FTAG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTIF
FTAG
Technology
FTIF
FTAG
-
Communication Services
FTIF
-
FTAG
-
Consumer Defensive
FTIF
-
FTAG
Financial Services
FTIF
-
FTAG
-
Healthcare
FTIF
-
FTAG
Utilities
FTIF
-
FTAG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTIF vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank
FTIF
FTAG
FTIF vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTIF | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 1.06 | +4.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.88 | 2.47 | +13.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTIF vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and FTAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTIF | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -90.89% | +63.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.46% | -9.56% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -21.87% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -79.11% | +75.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -71.25% | +65.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 4.11% | -2.17% |
Volatility
FTIF vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) at 3.88%. This indicates that FTIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTIF | FTAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.88% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 10.87% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 14.15% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 17.40% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 19.65% | -0.73% |
FTIF vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTIF vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison
FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FTAG's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.41% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.14% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTIF and FTAG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTIF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to FTAG (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs FTAG's -90.89%.
On 3-year performance, FTIF leads with 14.45% vs 4.14% for FTAG. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 14.45% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.
FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.14% for FTIF.
FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTIF and 0.70% for FTAG.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTIF and FTAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer