WZRD vs. DFND
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
WZRD vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WZRD
- 1D
- -6.30%
- 1M
- -58.43%
- 6M
- -88.82%
- YTD
- -89.20%
- 1Y
- -90.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WZRD vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -89.20% | -18.13% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and DFND is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WZRD vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WZRD | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.23% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.28% | — | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.62% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.67% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.67% | — | — |
WZRD vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.92%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 11.92% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and DFND have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WZRD is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WZRD is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 11.92%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.
They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 1.50% for DFND.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer