PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFND vs. CLSE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and CLSE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

DFND vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
16.77%
58.95%
DFND
CLSE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFND:

0.35

CLSE:

2.74

Sortino Ratio

DFND:

0.71

CLSE:

3.72

Omega Ratio

DFND:

1.10

CLSE:

1.48

Calmar Ratio

DFND:

0.88

CLSE:

4.91

Martin Ratio

DFND:

1.94

CLSE:

18.90

Ulcer Index

DFND:

5.68%

CLSE:

1.92%

Daily Std Dev

DFND:

32.15%

CLSE:

13.27%

Max Drawdown

DFND:

-22.65%

CLSE:

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

DFND:

-4.64%

CLSE:

-3.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFND achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 36.96% return.


DFND

YTD

14.91%

1M

-3.12%

6M

9.30%

1Y

10.99%

5Y*

6.75%

10Y*

N/A

CLSE

YTD

36.96%

1M

-1.31%

6M

8.59%

1Y

36.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFND vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%
Expense ratio chart for DFND: current value at 1.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFND vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFND, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.362.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFND, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.723.72
The chart of Omega ratio for DFND, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.111.48
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFND, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.914.91
The chart of Martin ratio for DFND, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.9918.90
DFND
CLSE

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.36
2.74
DFND
CLSE

Dividends

DFND vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than CLSE's 0.92% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
1.55%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.03%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFND vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and CLSE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.64%
-3.12%
DFND
CLSE

Volatility

DFND vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 5.48%. This indicates that DFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.68%
5.48%
DFND
CLSE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab