DFND vs. HTUS
DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. DFND is passively managed, while HTUS is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
DFND vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
DFND vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.92% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and HTUS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and HTUS has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTUS
DFND vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFND | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFND vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -47.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.91% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.04% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
DFND vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.06% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.10% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.50% | — |
DFND vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.72% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND and HTUS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HTUS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.72%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.
DFND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.97% for HTUS.
Find the right allocation for DFND and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer