DFND vs. 2B7C.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE).
DFND and 2B7C.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFND is a passively managed fund by SRN Advisors that tracks the performance of the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2016. 2B7C.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. Both DFND and 2B7C.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFND or 2B7C.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and 2B7C.DE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DFND:
0.41
2B7C.DE:
2.08
DFND:
0.79
2B7C.DE:
3.14
DFND:
1.12
2B7C.DE:
1.40
DFND:
1.07
2B7C.DE:
3.95
DFND:
2.29
2B7C.DE:
11.77
DFND:
5.88%
2B7C.DE:
2.49%
DFND:
33.40%
2B7C.DE:
14.14%
DFND:
-22.65%
2B7C.DE:
-41.33%
DFND:
-4.52%
2B7C.DE:
-2.44%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFND achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7C.DE's 5.39% return.
DFND
6.06%
0.12%
7.38%
10.98%
6.11%
N/A
2B7C.DE
5.39%
3.72%
16.33%
31.31%
13.51%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DFND
2B7C.DE
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison
DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while 2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 1.55% | 1.65% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.03% |
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown of -41.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and 2B7C.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFND vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) has a higher volatility of 11.66% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) at 3.97%. This indicates that DFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.