WMB vs. TFC
WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) and TFC (Truist Financial Corporation) are both stocks. WMB operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while TFC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WMB returned 19.28%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for TFC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMB vs. TFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMB achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than TFC's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WMB has outperformed TFC with an annualized return of 19.28%, while TFC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.15% annualized return.
WMB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
TFC
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 38.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
WMB vs. TFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.67% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | -8.20% | 14.18% | -23.88% | 2.02% |
TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 7.16% | 19.05% | 23.72% | -8.59% | -23.53% | 26.08% | -11.16% | 34.55% | -10.24% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMB and TFC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WMB and TFC has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
WMB:
$88.15B
TFC:
$65.43B
WMB:
$2.28
TFC:
$4.28
WMB:
31.55
TFC:
12.06
WMB:
1.64
TFC:
1.41
WMB:
7.39
TFC:
2.19
WMB:
6.80
TFC:
1.10
WMB:
$11.92B
TFC:
$30.47B
WMB:
$7.49B
TFC:
$19.17B
WMB:
$6.88B
TFC:
$6.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMB vs. TFC — Risk / Return Rank
WMB
TFC
WMB vs. TFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMB | TFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.71 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 4.50 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMB vs. TFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMB drawdown since its inception was -98.03%, which is greater than TFC's maximum drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMB and TFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMB | TFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.03% | -66.56% | -31.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -20.67% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -26.93% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | -59.11% | +36.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.08% | -59.11% | -8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -5.51% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -13.83% | -13.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 7.85% | -2.03% |
Volatility
WMB vs. TFC - Volatility Comparison
The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) have volatilities of 7.36% and 7.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMB | TFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 7.08% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 17.32% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.00% | 23.30% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 31.90% | -8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 33.62% | -2.67% |
Dividends
WMB vs. TFC - Dividend Comparison
WMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than TFC's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 4.03% | 4.23% | 4.79% | 5.63% | 4.65% | 3.18% | 3.76% | 3.04% | 3.60% | 2.53% | 2.45% | 2.78% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.84% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Financials
WMB vs. TFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Williams Companies, Inc. and Truist Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WMB vs. TFC - Profitability Comparison
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.49B and revenue of 3.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.
TFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.67B and revenue of 7.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32B and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.6%.
TFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 865.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.
TFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMB and TFC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMB has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to TFC (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMB dropped -98.03% vs TFC's -66.56%.
TFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMB and TFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer