TFC vs. BAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC).

Performance

TFC vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TFC vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TFC Truist Financial Corporation	-5.64%	19.05%	23.72%	-8.59%	-23.53%	26.08%	-11.16%	34.55%	-10.24%	8.66%
BAC Bank of America Corporation	-10.86%	28.04%	33.85%	4.83%	-23.82%	49.61%	-11.63%	46.19%	-15.00%	35.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TFC : $59.08B BAC : $367.91B
EPS TFC : $4.09 BAC : $4.03
PE Ratio TFC : 11.25 BAC : 12.11
PEG Ratio TFC : 1.32 BAC : 0.59
PS Ratio TFC : 1.96 BAC : 1.97
PB Ratio TFC : 0.98 BAC : 1.33
Total Revenue (TTM) TFC : $30.44B BAC : $188.75B
Gross Profit (TTM) TFC : $18.94B BAC : $104.61B
EBITDA (TTM) TFC : $7.05B BAC : $36.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFC achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's -10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TFC has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 7.45%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.19% annualized return.

TFC

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: -6.77%
• YTD: -5.64%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 17.09%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: -0.29%
• 10Y*: 7.45%

BAC

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -10.86%
• 6M: -4.48%
• 1Y: 19.45%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 6.87%
• 10Y*: 16.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TFC vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFC

TFC Risk / Return Rank: 61
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BAC

BAC Risk / Return Rank: 65
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFC vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TFC	BAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.73	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	1.06	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.16	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	1.16	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	3.17	-0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TFC vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFC and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFC	BAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	0.73	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.26	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.53	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.20	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between TFC and BAC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TFC vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than BAC's 2.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TFC Truist Financial Corporation	4.52%	4.23%	4.79%	5.63%	4.65%	3.18%	3.76%	3.04%	3.60%	2.53%	2.45%	2.78%
BAC Bank of America Corporation	2.26%	1.96%	2.28%	2.73%	2.60%	1.75%	2.38%	1.87%	2.19%	1.32%	1.13%	1.19%

Drawdowns

TFC vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFC drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFC and BAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFC	BAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.56%	-93.10%	+26.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.67%	-17.93%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.11%	-46.64%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.11%	-48.95%	-10.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.80%	-14.37%	-2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-28.40%	+14.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	6.57%	+0.60%

Volatility

TFC vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.67%. This indicates that TFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFC	BAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	6.67%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.45%	16.72%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.53%	26.82%	+1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.85%	26.84%	+5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.57%	30.80%	+2.77%

Financials

TFC vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Truist Financial Corporation and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.25B and revenue of 7.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.5%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.06B and revenue of 46.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

TFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 7.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 9.62B and revenue of 46.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

TFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 7.66B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 7.65B and revenue of 46.88B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.