WMB vs. CQP
Compare and contrast key facts about The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP).
Performance
WMB vs. CQP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMB vs. CQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.95% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | -8.20% | 14.18% | -23.88% | 2.02% |
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 22.61% | 6.80% | 12.59% | -5.09% | 44.79% | 27.83% | -4.97% | 16.60% | 30.13% | 8.91% |
Fundamentals
WMB:
$88.94B
CQP:
$31.28B
WMB:
$2.14
CQP:
$6.15
WMB:
33.97
CQP:
10.51
WMB:
1.76
CQP:
0.33
WMB:
7.45
CQP:
2.91
WMB:
6.96
CQP:
9.91
WMB:
$11.94B
CQP:
$10.76B
WMB:
$6.83B
CQP:
$4.31B
WMB:
$7.41B
CQP:
$4.42B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WMB having a 21.95% return and CQP slightly higher at 22.61%. Over the past 10 years, WMB has outperformed CQP with an annualized return of 23.08%, while CQP has yielded a comparatively lower 16.02% annualized return.
WMB
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 40.30%
- 5Y*
- 31.00%
- 10Y*
- 23.08%
CQP
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 22.61%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMB vs. CQP — Risk / Return Rank
WMB
CQP
WMB vs. CQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMB | CQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.13 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 0.38 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.05 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 0.31 | +1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 0.47 | +4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMB | CQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.13 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | 0.51 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.50 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.36 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMB and CQP is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WMB vs. CQP - Dividend Comparison
WMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than CQP's 5.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 2.78% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 5.11% | 6.15% | 5.06% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
WMB vs. CQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMB drawdown since its inception was -98.03%, which is greater than CQP's maximum drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMB and CQP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMB | CQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.03% | -78.46% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -23.58% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | -29.12% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.08% | -60.31% | -7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -7.86% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -14.69% | -12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 15.75% | -10.00% |
Volatility
WMB vs. CQP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) is 5.10%, while Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that WMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMB | CQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 12.49% | -7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 19.04% | -2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.70% | 30.56% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 32.29% | -8.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 32.17% | -0.55% |
Financials
WMB vs. CQP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Williams Companies, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WMB vs. CQP - Profitability Comparison
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 3.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.
CQP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 3.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.9%.
CQP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 734.00M and revenue of 3.20B, resulting in a net margin of 23.0%.
CQP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.