PortfoliosLab logo
WMB vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WMB and LNG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WMB vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WMB:

1.91

LNG:

1.72

Sortino Ratio

WMB:

2.44

LNG:

2.17

Omega Ratio

WMB:

1.35

LNG:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

WMB:

4.33

LNG:

2.26

Martin Ratio

WMB:

11.37

LNG:

7.09

Ulcer Index

WMB:

4.64%

LNG:

7.03%

Daily Std Dev

WMB:

26.46%

LNG:

29.15%

Max Drawdown

WMB:

-98.04%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

WMB:

-5.52%

LNG:

-7.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WMB:

$70.90B

LNG:

$51.61B

EPS

WMB:

$1.86

LNG:

$13.64

PE Ratio

WMB:

31.22

LNG:

17.06

PEG Ratio

WMB:

2.53

LNG:

2.08

PS Ratio

WMB:

6.40

LNG:

3.08

PB Ratio

WMB:

5.69

LNG:

9.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

WMB:

$10.91B

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WMB:

$7.07B

LNG:

$8.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

WMB:

$5.96B

LNG:

$6.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMB achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WMB has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 6.88%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.


WMB

YTD

8.50%

1M

1.46%

6M

6.53%

1Y

50.04%

5Y*

32.74%

10Y*

6.88%

LNG

YTD

9.03%

1M

5.46%

6M

11.56%

1Y

49.55%

5Y*

42.67%

10Y*

12.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WMB vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WMB is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WMB is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WMB is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WMB is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WMB is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WMB is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WMB vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMB and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WMB vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

WMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than LNG's 0.83% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
3.31%3.51%5.14%5.17%6.30%7.98%6.41%6.17%3.94%5.39%9.53%4.36%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.83%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WMB vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMB drawdown since its inception was -98.04%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMB and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WMB vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.79%. This indicates that WMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WMB vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Williams Companies, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
3.05B
5.44B
(WMB) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WMB vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Williams Companies, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
79.8%
20.0%
(WMB) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
WMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

WMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.09B and revenue of 3.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.9%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

WMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 691.00M and revenue of 3.05B, resulting in a net margin of 22.7%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.