PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFC vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFC achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TFC has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 7.09%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


TFC

1D
2.67%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
5.68%
1Y
28.22%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
7.09%

SPY

1D
0.14%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
-0.19%19.05%23.72%-8.59%-23.53%26.08%-11.16%34.55%-10.24%8.66%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TFC and SPY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1993

0.59

The correlation between TFC and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFC
TFC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFCSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

2.52

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

3.42

-1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.42

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.57

15.93

-12.36

TFC vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFC and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFCSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.52

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.84

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.87

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.59

-0.30

Drawdowns

TFC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFC drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFC and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFCSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

-55.19%

-11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-8.88%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-18.76%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.11%

-24.50%

-34.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

-33.72%

-25.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.99%

0.00%

-11.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-9.05%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

1.91%

+5.76%

Volatility

TFC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that TFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFCSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

2.75%

+4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

8.89%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

11.81%

+11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.85%

17.05%

+14.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.60%

17.94%

+15.66%

Dividends

TFC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
4.32%4.23%4.79%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFC and SPY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFC has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFC dropped -66.56% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFC and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer