WDS vs. PDO
WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) and PDO (Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund) are both stocks. WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while PDO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, WDS returned 12.79%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for PDO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WDS vs. PDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 52.08% return, which is significantly higher than PDO's -1.72% return.
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
PDO
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -1.43%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
WDS vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -19.52% |
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund | -1.72% | 13.96% | 24.55% | 8.06% | -23.40% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDS and PDO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between WDS and PDO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDS vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank
WDS
PDO
WDS vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDS | PDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.16 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 0.66 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 2.29 | +5.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDS vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and PDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDS | PDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.06% | -36.83% | -40.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -11.18% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.77% | -16.55% | -32.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.77% | -36.83% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -5.54% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -14.37% | -25.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 3.20% | +4.20% |
Volatility
WDS vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) at 3.68%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDS | PDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 3.68% | +6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 9.06% | +15.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 10.08% | +20.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 15.80% | +17.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 15.54% | +18.24% |
Dividends
WDS vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison
WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, less than PDO's 11.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund | 11.94% | 11.09% | 11.29% | 12.54% | 19.09% | 8.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
WDS vs. PDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WDS and PDO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDS has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to PDO (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs PDO's -36.83%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDS and PDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer