PDO vs. PCN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN).

PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.

Performance

PDO vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PDO vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund	-3.95%	13.96%	24.55%	8.06%	-23.40%	5.93%
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	-4.21%	5.55%	19.52%	16.22%	-22.88%	6.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDO achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.21% return.

PDO

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: -6.43%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -3.24%
• 1Y: 4.22%
• 3Y*: 13.83%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

PCN

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -4.53%
• YTD: -4.21%
• 6M: -6.22%
• 1Y: -3.05%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 8.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PDO vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDO

PDO Risk / Return Rank: 51
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

PCN

PCN Risk / Return Rank: 3
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDO vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDO	PCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	-0.20	+0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	-0.15	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.97	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	-0.20	+0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	-0.66	+2.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDO vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDO and PCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDO	PCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	-0.20	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.14	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.39	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between PDO and PCN is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PDO vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.87%, more than PCN's 11.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund	11.87%	11.09%	11.29%	12.54%	19.09%	8.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	11.34%	10.58%	10.06%	10.88%	12.66%	7.89%	7.83%	7.37%	9.60%	7.85%	11.98%	10.22%

Drawdowns

PDO vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDO drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDO and PCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDO	PCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	-61.12%	+24.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.82%	-13.78%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.83%	-33.39%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.68%	-6.71%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.75%	-7.22%	-7.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	4.32%	-1.54%

Volatility

PDO vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 5.81%. This indicates that PDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDO	PCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	5.81%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.40%	8.64%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	15.69%	-0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	16.55%	-0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	21.97%	-6.28%