WDS vs. RIO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO).

Performance

WDS vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WDS vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	57.42%	6.78%	-20.60%	-4.42%	68.06%	-6.77%	-24.23%	14.38%	-9.70%	19.32%
RIO Rio Tinto Group	21.78%	44.47%	-15.36%	11.06%	18.48%	-3.67%	36.22%	33.18%	-2.93%	44.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WDS : $45.72B RIO : $155.34B
EPS WDS : $3.29 RIO : $13.11
PE Ratio WDS : 7.26 RIO : 7.23
PS Ratio WDS : 1.75 RIO : 1.39
PB Ratio WDS : 1.27 RIO : 2.50
Total Revenue (TTM) WDS : $26.15B RIO : $111.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) WDS : $9.87B RIO : $31.10B
EBITDA (TTM) WDS : $17.06B RIO : $40.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 57.42% return, which is significantly higher than RIO's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 8.07%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.89% annualized return.

WDS

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 19.83%
• YTD: 57.42%
• 6M: 63.07%
• 1Y: 74.61%
• 3Y*: 9.04%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

RIO

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 21.78%
• 6M: 47.02%
• 1Y: 65.74%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: 20.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WDS vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS

WDS Risk / Return Rank: 89
WDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
WDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
WDS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
WDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WDS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

RIO

RIO Risk / Return Rank: 91
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDS vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDS	RIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.35	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.92	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	4.36	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	14.45	-5.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDS vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDS	RIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.35	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.41	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.68	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.33	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and RIO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WDS vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than RIO's 4.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	4.69%	6.80%	8.27%	10.62%	8.84%	2.39%	4.41%	5.12%	5.45%	3.65%	5.21%	9.84%
RIO Rio Tinto Group	4.24%	4.66%	7.40%	5.40%	10.48%	10.23%	5.13%	7.68%	6.32%	4.47%	3.93%	7.58%

Drawdowns

WDS vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and RIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDS	RIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.06%	-88.97%	+11.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.03%	-15.19%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-36.97%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.16%	-37.47%	-28.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.05%	-3.29%	-3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.87%	-23.88%	-15.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.92%	4.58%	+3.34%

Volatility

WDS vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 10.28%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDS	RIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	10.28%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.62%	20.88%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.18%	28.16%	+6.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.07%	29.07%	+4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.80%	30.93%	+2.87%

Financials

WDS vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

WDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

WDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.