WDS vs. RIO

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a -14.30% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of -1.86%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than RIO's 6.64% yield.

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.53%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and RIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 20.55% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 12.33%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.