PortfoliosLab logo
WDS vs. RIO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and RIO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

WDS vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WDS:

-0.54

RIO:

-0.39

Sortino Ratio

WDS:

-0.58

RIO:

-0.14

Omega Ratio

WDS:

0.92

RIO:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

WDS:

-0.32

RIO:

-0.22

Martin Ratio

WDS:

-1.04

RIO:

-0.44

Ulcer Index

WDS:

18.12%

RIO:

12.23%

Daily Std Dev

WDS:

33.59%

RIO:

24.61%

Max Drawdown

WDS:

-77.53%

RIO:

-88.97%

Current Drawdown

WDS:

-49.32%

RIO:

-9.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WDS:

$26.73B

RIO:

$101.77B

EPS

WDS:

$1.87

RIO:

$7.07

PE Ratio

WDS:

7.53

RIO:

8.86

PS Ratio

WDS:

2.03

RIO:

1.90

PB Ratio

WDS:

0.76

RIO:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

WDS:

$13.18B

RIO:

$53.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WDS:

$5.68B

RIO:

$16.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

WDS:

$8.16B

RIO:

$19.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a -6.79% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of -1.08%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


WDS

YTD

-6.79%

1M

9.52%

6M

-8.32%

1Y

-18.07%

3Y*

-4.04%

5Y*

5.57%

10Y*

-1.08%

RIO

YTD

9.96%

1M

7.25%

6M

4.10%

1Y

-9.60%

3Y*

3.42%

5Y*

12.40%

10Y*

11.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Woodside Energy Group Ltd

Rio Tinto Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WDS vs. RIO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WDS is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WDS is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WDS is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WDS is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WDS is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WDS is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIO is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIO is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIO is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIO is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIO is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIO is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WDS vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WDS vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than RIO's 6.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
8.70%8.27%10.62%8.84%2.64%4.63%5.28%5.63%3.81%3.43%10.03%6.92%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
6.44%7.40%5.40%10.48%14.39%5.13%10.70%6.32%4.45%3.96%7.79%4.46%

Drawdowns

WDS vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.53%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and RIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WDS vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 6.28%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WDS vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
7.19B
26.86B
(WDS) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WDS vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
41.2%
27.8%
(WDS) Gross Margin
(RIO) Gross Margin
WDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 2.96B and revenue of 7.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.2%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 7.47B and revenue of 26.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

WDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 7.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 7.39B and revenue of 26.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

WDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 7.19B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 26.86B, resulting in a net margin of 21.4%.