WDS vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, WDS returned 5.76%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WDS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 25.65% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 16.62% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 5.76%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.

WDS

• 1D: -3.54%
• 1M: -15.63%
• YTD: 25.65%
• 6M: 27.03%
• 1Y: 29.62%
• 3Y*: 0.85%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 5.76%

SCHD

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: 16.62%
• 6M: 15.65%
• 1Y: 23.21%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 12.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	25.65%	6.78%	-20.60%	-4.42%	68.06%	-6.77%	-24.23%	14.38%	-9.70%	19.32%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	16.62%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and SCHD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.43

Return for Risk

WDS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS

WDS Risk / Return Rank: 68
WDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
WDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
WDS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
WDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
WDS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDS	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.10	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	3.20	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.37	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	5.05	-3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.78	12.16	-8.37

WDS vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WDS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDS	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.06%	-33.37%	-43.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.08%	-4.61%	-18.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.77%	-16.13%	-32.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-16.85%	-31.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.16%	-33.37%	-32.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.81%	-3.38%	-22.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.53%	-3.31%	-36.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.85%	1.92%	+5.93%

Volatility

WDS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a higher volatility of 15.28% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.13%. This indicates that WDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDS	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.28%	3.13%	+12.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.39%	7.80%	+18.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.19%	11.12%	+21.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.75%	14.36%	+19.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.85%	16.71%	+17.14%

Dividends

WDS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than SCHD's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.33%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	5.88%	6.80%	8.27%	10.62%	8.84%	2.39%	4.41%	5.12%	5.45%	3.65%	5.21%	9.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDS and SCHD in my portfolio?

WDS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDS or SCHD?

WDS has higher volatility (15.28%) compared to SCHD (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.