PDO vs. BTZ
PDO (Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund) and BTZ (BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, PDO returned 2.67%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BTZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PDO vs. BTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDO achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly higher than BTZ's -2.22% return.
PDO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 8.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
BTZ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
PDO vs. BTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund | -0.79% | 13.96% | 24.55% | 8.06% | -23.40% | 5.93% |
BTZ BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust | -2.22% | 13.70% | 11.25% | 12.78% | -27.11% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDO and BTZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDO vs. BTZ — Risk / Return Rank
PDO
BTZ
PDO vs. BTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDO | BTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.52 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.84 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 1.50 | +1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDO | BTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.52 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.09 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.19 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
PDO vs. BTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDO drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum BTZ drawdown of -74.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDO and BTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDO | BTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -74.62% | +37.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -9.29% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -9.29% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.83% | -34.67% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -3.73% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.44% | -12.51% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.76% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PDO vs. BTZ - Volatility Comparison
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) at 3.22%. This indicates that PDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDO | BTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 3.22% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 7.66% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 8.95% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 12.84% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 13.13% | +2.44% |
Dividends
PDO vs. BTZ - Dividend Comparison
PDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than BTZ's 9.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTZ BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust | 9.90% | 9.30% | 9.63% | 9.76% | 9.14% | 6.69% | 6.84% | 6.23% | 7.19% | 6.25% | 6.90% | 7.83% |
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund | 11.72% | 11.09% | 11.29% | 12.54% | 19.09% | 8.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PDO vs. BTZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund and BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PDO and BTZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDO has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to BTZ (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDO dropped -36.83% vs BTZ's -74.62%.
PDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDO and BTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer