WDS vs. BHP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and BHP Group (BHP).

Performance

WDS vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and BHP Group (BHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WDS vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	57.42%	6.78%	-20.60%	-4.42%	68.06%	-6.77%	-24.23%	14.38%	-9.70%	19.32%
BHP BHP Group	22.86%	28.91%	-24.64%	16.50%	44.34%	0.91%	25.37%	24.50%	10.55%	33.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WDS : $45.72B BHP : $185.09B
EPS WDS : $3.29 BHP : $8.51
PE Ratio WDS : 7.26 BHP : 8.55
PEG Ratio WDS : 0.24 BHP : 2.36
PS Ratio WDS : 1.75 BHP : 1.72
PB Ratio WDS : 1.27 BHP : 3.67
Total Revenue (TTM) WDS : $26.15B BHP : $107.64B
Gross Profit (TTM) WDS : $9.87B BHP : $89.04B
EBITDA (TTM) WDS : $17.06B BHP : $52.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 57.42% return, which is significantly higher than BHP's 22.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 8.07%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 20.74% annualized return.

WDS

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 19.83%
• YTD: 57.42%
• 6M: 63.07%
• 1Y: 74.61%
• 3Y*: 9.04%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

BHP

• 1D: 5.39%
• 1M: -9.07%
• YTD: 22.86%
• 6M: 33.04%
• 1Y: 56.18%
• 3Y*: 9.75%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 20.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WDS vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS

WDS Risk / Return Rank: 89
WDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
WDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
WDS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
WDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WDS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

BHP

BHP Risk / Return Rank: 86
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDS vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDS	BHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.74	+0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.31	+0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.30	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	2.78	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	10.26	-1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDS vs. BHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the BHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and BHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDS	BHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	1.74	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.41	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.64	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.31	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and BHP is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WDS vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than BHP's 3.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	4.69%	6.80%	8.27%	10.62%	8.84%	2.39%	4.41%	5.12%	5.45%	3.65%	5.21%	9.84%
BHP BHP Group	3.66%	3.64%	5.98%	4.98%	22.44%	9.98%	3.67%	8.59%	4.89%	3.61%	1.68%	9.38%

Drawdowns

WDS vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and BHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDS	BHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.06%	-76.22%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.03%	-19.80%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-37.21%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.16%	-44.29%	-21.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.05%	-10.65%	+3.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.87%	-21.37%	-18.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.92%	5.36%	+2.56%

Volatility

WDS vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is 11.95%, while BHP Group (BHP) has a volatility of 12.91%. This indicates that WDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDS	BHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	12.91%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.62%	22.72%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.18%	32.44%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.07%	31.93%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.80%	32.59%	+1.21%

Financials

WDS vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and BHP Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

WDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BHP Group reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

WDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BHP Group reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.