WDS vs. AGCO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) and AGCO (AGCO Corporation) are both stocks. WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while AGCO operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, WDS returned 7.39%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for AGCO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WDS vs. AGCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDS achieves a 48.39% return, which is significantly higher than AGCO's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WDS has underperformed AGCO with an annualized return of 7.39%, while AGCO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.75% annualized return.

WDS

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -4.33%
• YTD: 48.39%
• 6M: 38.86%
• 1Y: 64.37%
• 3Y*: 5.60%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: 7.39%

AGCO

• 1D: 5.69%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 6M: 14.09%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: 1.56%
• 5Y*: 0.20%
• 10Y*: 10.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDS vs. AGCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	48.39%	6.78%	-20.60%	-4.42%	68.06%	-6.77%	-24.23%	14.38%	-9.70%	19.32%
AGCO AGCO Corporation	14.03%	12.85%	-20.33%	-7.90%	24.99%	16.16%	34.77%	40.02%	-21.30%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WDS and AGCO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between WDS and AGCO has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap WDS : $43.10B AGCO : $8.61B
EPS WDS : $3.29 AGCO : $10.42
PE Ratio WDS : 6.85 AGCO : 11.36
PEG Ratio WDS : 0.23 AGCO : 0.44
PS Ratio WDS : 1.65 AGCO : 0.84
PB Ratio WDS : 1.20 AGCO : 2.00
Total Revenue (TTM) WDS : $26.15B AGCO : $10.37B
Gross Profit (TTM) WDS : $9.87B AGCO : $2.58B
EBITDA (TTM) WDS : $17.06B AGCO : $984.20M

Return for Risk

WDS vs. AGCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDS

WDS Risk / Return Rank: 86
WDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
WDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WDS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
WDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WDS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

AGCO

AGCO Risk / Return Rank: 59
AGCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AGCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AGCO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AGCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AGCO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDS vs. AGCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDS	AGCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	0.65	+1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.21	+1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.14	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	0.99	+2.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	2.16	+7.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDS vs. AGCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the AGCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDS and AGCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDS	AGCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	0.65	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.01	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.31	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.24	-0.20

Drawdowns

WDS vs. AGCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDS drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, smaller than the maximum AGCO drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDS and AGCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDS	AGCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.06%	-83.96%	+6.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-22.23%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.77%	-43.50%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-43.50%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.16%	-54.07%	-12.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.38%	-15.51%	+3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.60%	-29.74%	-9.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.12%	10.22%	-3.10%

Volatility

WDS vs. AGCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is 8.81%, while AGCO Corporation (AGCO) has a volatility of 11.87%. This indicates that WDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDS	AGCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.81%	11.87%	-3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.06%	23.94%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.76%	33.33%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.26%	35.08%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.73%	35.05%	-1.32%

Dividends

WDS vs. AGCO - Dividend Comparison

WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than AGCO's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGCO AGCO Corporation	0.99%	1.11%	3.92%	5.03%	3.91%	4.10%	0.62%	0.82%	1.08%	0.78%	0.90%	1.06%
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd	4.98%	6.80%	8.27%	10.62%	8.84%	2.39%	4.41%	5.12%	5.45%	3.65%	5.21%	9.84%

Financials

WDS vs. AGCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Woodside Energy Group Ltd and AGCO Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

AGCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.40M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.

WDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

AGCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 80.70M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

WDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.

AGCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 55.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDS and AGCO in my portfolio?

WDS and AGCO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDS or AGCO?

AGCO has higher volatility (11.87%) compared to WDS (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDS dropped -77.06% vs AGCO's -83.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.