PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDO vs. PPFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PDO vs. PPFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PDO vs. PPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.94%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.93%
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
1.35%7.45%4.29%7.54%1.84%18.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDO achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than PPFIX's 1.35% return.


PDO

1D
2.09%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*

PPFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.35%
6M
3.55%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDO vs. PPFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFIX
PPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDO vs. PPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDOPPFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.43

2.00

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

2.50

-1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

2.96

-1.83

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.14

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.28

21.67

-19.39

PDO vs. PPFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the PPFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDO and PPFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDOPPFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

2.00

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.57

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.80

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between PDO and PPFIX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PDO vs. PPFIX - Dividend Comparison

PDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.63%, more than PPFIX's 5.62% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.63%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
5.62%5.62%6.24%6.86%1.92%7.16%0.44%0.23%0.93%2.68%

Drawdowns

PDO vs. PPFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDO drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than PPFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDO and PPFIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PDOPPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-15.64%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-2.77%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

-4.49%

-32.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

-0.07%

-5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-1.37%

-13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

0.27%

+2.54%

Volatility

PDO vs. PPFIX - Volatility Comparison

Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) at 0.31%. This indicates that PDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PDOPPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

0.31%

+7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

0.67%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.99%

3.58%

+11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

3.87%

+12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

7.18%

+8.53%