WARP vs. SEA
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and SEA (U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index while SEA tracks the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SEA.
Performance
WARP vs. SEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEA
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 20.79%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. SEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF | -2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and SEA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. SEA — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
SEA
WARP vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARP | SEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 22.26 | 0.39 | +21.87 |
Drawdowns
WARP vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum SEA drawdown of -39.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and SEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | SEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -39.53% | +20.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -3.07% | -15.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -14.31% | +11.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | SEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.83% | 16.28% | +67.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 21.67% | +62.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 21.67% | +62.16% |
WARP vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SEA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF | 5.59% | 6.76% | 18.47% | 9.85% | 18.73% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and SEA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.
SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.60% for SEA.
Find the right allocation for WARP and SEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer