SEA vs. SHPP
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP).
SEA and SHPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEA is a passively managed fund by US Global that tracks the performance of the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 19, 2022. SHPP is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. Both SEA and SHPP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SEA or SHPP.
Correlation
The correlation between SEA and SHPP is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SEA vs. SHPP - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SEA:
-0.49
SHPP:
-0.10
SEA:
-0.35
SHPP:
0.09
SEA:
0.95
SHPP:
1.01
SEA:
-0.24
SHPP:
-0.02
SEA:
-0.54
SHPP:
-0.09
SEA:
14.65%
SHPP:
4.93%
SEA:
22.38%
SHPP:
18.10%
SEA:
-39.52%
SHPP:
-21.57%
SEA:
-18.67%
SHPP:
-7.63%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEA having a -1.85% return and SHPP slightly higher at -1.77%.
SEA
-1.85%
14.06%
-6.32%
-11.65%
N/A
N/A
SHPP
-1.77%
7.62%
-7.03%
-2.16%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEA vs. SHPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SHPP's 0.61% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SEA vs. SHPP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SEA
SHPP
SEA vs. SHPP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SEA vs. SHPP - Dividend Comparison
SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.82%, more than SHPP's 2.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF | 18.82% | 18.47% | 9.85% | 18.72% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 2.71% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.14% |
Drawdowns
SEA vs. SHPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.52%, which is greater than SHPP's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and SHPP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
SEA vs. SHPP - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) at 5.23%. This indicates that SEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...