PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEA vs. SHPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEA vs. SHPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEA vs. SHPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
19.09%16.78%2.52%19.33%-17.96%
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
2.70%12.88%0.76%20.86%-4.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 19.09% return, which is significantly higher than SHPP's 2.70% return.


SEA

1D
2.77%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
19.09%
6M
27.29%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*

SHPP

1D
2.99%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
2.70%
6M
7.77%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEA vs. SHPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SHPP's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEA vs. SHPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SHPP
SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. SHPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEASHPPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.00

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

1.50

+1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.20

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.43

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.29

5.64

+7.65

SEA vs. SHPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the SHPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA and SHPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEASHPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.00

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.48

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SEA and SHPP is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SEA vs. SHPP - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than SHPP's 1.89% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.67%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
1.89%1.80%2.41%2.89%1.15%

Drawdowns

SEA vs. SHPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than SHPP's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and SHPP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEASHPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-21.57%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.06%

-12.89%

-3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-8.40%

+5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.84%

-4.38%

-10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.27%

+0.07%

Volatility

SEA vs. SHPP - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) at 6.32%. This indicates that SEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEASHPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

6.32%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

11.05%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.91%

18.42%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

17.39%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

17.39%

+4.48%