PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WARP vs. RBLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WARP vs. RBLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WARP

1D
-6.84%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBLD

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.95%
YTD
19.89%
6M
18.51%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARP vs. RBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WARP and RBLD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WARP vs. RBLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WARP

RBLD
RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WARP vs. RBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WARP vs. RBLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WARPRBLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

22.26

0.38

+21.88

Drawdowns

WARP vs. RBLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum RBLD drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and RBLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARPRBLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-50.07%

+31.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.67%

-0.71%

-17.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-10.84%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

Volatility

WARP vs. RBLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARPRBLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.83%

13.45%

+70.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.83%

16.82%

+67.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.83%

18.73%

+65.10%

WARP vs. RBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

WARP vs. RBLD - Dividend Comparison

WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
1.01%1.19%1.31%1.16%2.10%1.45%2.88%1.84%1.74%1.49%2.01%1.17%
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WARP and RBLD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.

RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.

WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.65% for RBLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WARP and RBLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer