PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLD vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLD vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLD achieves a 21.51% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RBLD has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 9.29%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


RBLD

1D
0.76%
1M
2.69%
YTD
21.51%
6M
20.56%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
9.29%

UTES

1D
0.95%
1M
1.74%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.66%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLD vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
21.51%13.99%17.94%19.36%-9.87%12.98%0.51%12.81%-21.72%22.95%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
5.53%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLD and UTES is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.40

Over the past year, RBLD and UTES have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

RBLD vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RBLD
UTES

Industrials

40.4%

-

Utilities

27.6%
100.0%

Technology

11.8%

-

Energy

8.7%

-

Basic Materials

6.6%

-

Real Estate

4.9%

-

Communication Services

1.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

RBLD
40.4%
UTES

-

Utilities

RBLD
27.6%
UTES
100.0%

Technology

RBLD
11.8%
UTES

-

Energy

RBLD
8.7%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

RBLD
6.6%
UTES

-

Real Estate

RBLD
4.9%
UTES

-

Communication Services

RBLD
1.0%
UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

RBLD

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

RBLD

-

UTES

-

Financial Services

RBLD

-

UTES

-

Healthcare

RBLD

-

UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLD vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLD
RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLD vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBLDUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.12

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

0.99

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.05

2.15

+12.90

RBLD vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLD and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBLD vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLD drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLD and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLDUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.07%

-35.39%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-13.88%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-17.62%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-20.40%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.07%

-35.39%

-14.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.32%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-5.53%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

6.35%

-4.24%

Volatility

RBLD vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is 4.68%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that RBLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLDUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

6.78%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

16.89%

-6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

21.52%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

20.64%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

20.21%

-1.52%

RBLD vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLD vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

RBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than UTES's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
1.00%1.19%1.31%1.16%2.10%1.45%2.88%1.84%1.74%1.49%2.01%1.17%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.44%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLD and UTES have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to RBLD (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLD dropped -50.07% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.78% vs 9.29% for RBLD. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.

UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.00% for RBLD.

RBLD is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBLD and 0.49% for UTES.

RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLD and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer