RBLD vs. PAVE
RBLD (First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - RBLD tracks the Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net while PAVE tracks the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBLD returned 11.68%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for PAVE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBLD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
RBLD vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLD achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.97% return.
RBLD
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
PAVE
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 37.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.34%
- 10Y*
- —
RBLD vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF | 19.77% | 13.99% | 17.94% | 19.36% | -9.87% | 12.98% | 0.51% | 12.81% | -21.72% | 17.84% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.97% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLD and PAVE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RBLD and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
RBLD vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RBLD
PAVE
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
RBLD
PAVE
Utilities
RBLD
PAVE
Technology
RBLD
PAVE
Energy
RBLD
PAVE
Basic Materials
RBLD
PAVE
Real Estate
RBLD
PAVE
-
Communication Services
RBLD
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
RBLD
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
RBLD
-
PAVE
Financial Services
RBLD
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
RBLD
-
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLD vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
RBLD
PAVE
RBLD vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBLD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 3.12 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | 11.34 | +2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBLD vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLD drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLD and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.07% | -44.08% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.19% | -11.91% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.14% | -26.23% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -26.23% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -2.41% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -6.21% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 3.27% | -1.16% |
Volatility
RBLD vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is 4.94%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that RBLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 7.01% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 15.90% | -5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 19.63% | -5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 21.67% | -4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 24.40% | -5.78% |
RBLD vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBLD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBLD vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
RBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.31% | 1.16% | 2.10% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.84% | 1.74% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLD and PAVE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to RBLD (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLD dropped -50.07% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 18.34% vs 11.68% for RBLD. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.
RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBLD and 0.47% for PAVE.
RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBLD and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer