PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLD vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLD vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLD achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 10.91% return.


RBLD

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.92%
6M
10.34%
YTD
16.81%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
8.19%
ALL TIME*
8.64%

QGRW

1D
2.15%
1M
-0.09%
6M
10.31%
YTD
10.91%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.15M$14.16M$19.72M
$127.03K$1.03M$779.49K

RBLD vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
16.81%13.99%17.94%19.36%-3.15%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
10.91%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLD and QGRW is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022

0.60

The correlation between RBLD and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBLD vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RBLD
QGRW

Industrials

42.4%
9.3%

Utilities

27.9%
0.9%

Technology

10.9%
50.7%

Energy

8.3%
0.5%

Basic Materials

6.1%

-

Real Estate

4.3%

-

Communication Services

1.0%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

3.7%

Healthcare

-

5.5%

Industrials

RBLD
42.4%
QGRW
9.3%

Utilities

RBLD
27.9%
QGRW
0.9%

Technology

RBLD
10.9%
QGRW
50.7%

Energy

RBLD
8.3%
QGRW
0.5%

Basic Materials

RBLD
6.1%
QGRW

-

Real Estate

RBLD
4.3%
QGRW

-

Communication Services

RBLD
1.0%
QGRW
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RBLD

-

QGRW
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

RBLD

-

QGRW
0.5%

Financial Services

RBLD

-

QGRW
3.7%

Healthcare

RBLD

-

QGRW
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLD vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBLD
RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBLD vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBLDQGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.30

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

4.44

+4.16

RBLD vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLD and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBLD vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLD drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLD and QGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLDQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.07%

-24.40%

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-15.44%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-24.40%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-5.19%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-3.34%

-7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

4.51%

-2.33%

Volatility

RBLD vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is 3.65%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that RBLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLDQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

5.89%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

15.87%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

19.49%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

21.24%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

21.24%

-2.74%

RBLD vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLD vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

RBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.08%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
0.97%1.19%1.31%1.16%2.10%1.45%2.88%1.84%1.74%1.49%2.01%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLD and QGRW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRW has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to RBLD (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLD dropped -50.07% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 24.09% vs 18.07% for RBLD. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.

RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

RBLD is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while QGRW is Quality Factor. RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBLD and 0.28% for QGRW.

RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLD and QGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer