WARP vs. KARS
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index while KARS tracks the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KARS.
Performance
WARP vs. KARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -33.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KARS
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -10.78%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 42.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -13.52% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | -15.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and KARS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KARS
WARP vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WARP | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WARP vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and KARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -64.85% | +23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.34% | -36.80% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -28.34% | +13.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.59% | 27.83% | +60.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.59% | 30.09% | +58.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.59% | 29.41% | +59.18% |
WARP vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and KARS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.
KARS has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.72% for KARS.
Find the right allocation for WARP and KARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer