PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KARS vs. MOTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KARS vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than MOTO's 23.13% return.


KARS

1D
-6.95%
1M
-11.51%
YTD
7.21%
6M
6.99%
1Y
54.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-3.92%
10Y*

MOTO

1D
-6.05%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
23.13%
6M
21.84%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KARS vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
7.21%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%7.02%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
23.13%27.38%2.01%27.10%-27.20%17.22%59.13%4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between KARS and MOTO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.75

The correlation between KARS and MOTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KARS vs. MOTO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KARS
MOTO

Consumer Cyclical

34.3%
23.5%

Basic Materials

26.6%
3.8%

Industrials

21.9%
12.8%

Technology

17.2%
45.6%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.3%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KARS
34.3%
MOTO
23.5%

Basic Materials

KARS
26.6%
MOTO
3.8%

Industrials

KARS
21.9%
MOTO
12.8%

Technology

KARS
17.2%
MOTO
45.6%

Communication Services

KARS

-

MOTO
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

KARS

-

MOTO
2.3%

Energy

KARS

-

MOTO

-

Financial Services

KARS

-

MOTO
1.0%

Healthcare

KARS

-

MOTO

-

Real Estate

KARS

-

MOTO

-

Utilities

KARS

-

MOTO
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KARS vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MOTO
MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KARS vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KARSMOTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.62

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

12.87

+1.65

KARS vs. MOTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARS Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the MOTO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARS and MOTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KARSMOTODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.20

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.38

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.67

-0.51

Drawdowns

KARS vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and MOTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KARSMOTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.85%

-38.24%

-26.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.86%

-13.36%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-26.43%

-21.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.85%

-37.34%

-27.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.65%

-6.38%

-28.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-9.96%

-18.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.75%

-0.06%

Volatility

KARS vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) at 9.78%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KARSMOTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

9.78%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.05%

17.91%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

22.04%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.93%

23.76%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.38%

26.39%

+2.99%

KARS vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

KARS vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison

KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than MOTO's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.17%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
0.86%1.06%1.07%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KARS and MOTO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to MOTO (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs MOTO's -38.24%.

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 9.03% vs -3.92% for KARS. On fees, MOTO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 9.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 9.03% return vs -3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOTO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

MOTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.17% for KARS.

KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while MOTO is Transportation Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.68% for MOTO.

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KARS and MOTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer