KARS vs. KGRN
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN).
KARS and KGRN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KARS is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2018. KGRN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2017. Both KARS and KGRN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KARS vs. KGRN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KARS vs. KGRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 5.44% | 46.04% | -17.88% | -7.85% | -39.20% | 24.11% | 71.17% | 34.66% | -28.33% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 6.26% | 21.45% | -1.11% | -14.75% | -40.45% | 5.91% | 138.49% | 12.12% | -32.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than KGRN's 6.26% return.
KARS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 53.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
KGRN
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- -10.52%
- 1Y
- 12.62%
- 3Y*
- 1.14%
- 5Y*
- -6.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KARS vs. KGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than KGRN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KARS vs. KGRN — Risk / Return Rank
KARS
KGRN
KARS vs. KGRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KARS | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.46 | +1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 0.82 | +1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.11 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 0.73 | +2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.69 | 1.37 | +11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KARS | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.46 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.18 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.09 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between KARS and KGRN is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
KARS vs. KGRN - Dividend Comparison
KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than KGRN's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.80% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
KARS vs. KGRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, roughly equal to the maximum KGRN drawdown of -66.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and KGRN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KARS | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.85% | -66.24% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -17.26% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.85% | -63.60% | -1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.73% | -44.36% | +8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -33.73% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 9.20% | -5.11% |
Volatility
KARS vs. KGRN - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) at 7.19%. This indicates that KARS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KARS | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 7.19% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.50% | 17.57% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.52% | 27.60% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.61% | 34.83% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 33.05% | -3.73% |