PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KARS vs. HAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KARS vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 21.08% return.


KARS

1D
-6.95%
1M
-11.51%
YTD
7.21%
6M
6.99%
1Y
54.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-3.92%
10Y*

HAIL

1D
-8.01%
1M
5.85%
YTD
21.08%
6M
17.54%
1Y
43.45%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
-6.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KARS vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
7.21%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-28.33%
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
21.08%19.62%-6.98%9.65%-45.72%1.95%84.33%30.63%-25.09%

Correlation

The correlation between KARS and HAIL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2018

0.76

The correlation between KARS and HAIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KARS vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KARS
HAIL

Consumer Cyclical

34.3%
33.3%

Basic Materials

26.6%
1.2%

Industrials

21.9%
20.1%

Technology

17.2%
32.9%

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

4.5%

Financial Services

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

KARS
34.3%
HAIL
33.3%

Basic Materials

KARS
26.6%
HAIL
1.2%

Industrials

KARS
21.9%
HAIL
20.1%

Technology

KARS
17.2%
HAIL
32.9%

Communication Services

KARS

-

HAIL
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

KARS

-

HAIL

-

Energy

KARS

-

HAIL
4.5%

Financial Services

KARS

-

HAIL
3.1%

Healthcare

KARS

-

HAIL

-

Real Estate

KARS

-

HAIL

-

Utilities

KARS

-

HAIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KARS vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HAIL
HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KARS vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KARSHAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

2.49

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

7.48

+7.03

KARS vs. HAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KARS Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the HAIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KARS and HAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KARSHAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.53

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.22

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.17

-0.01

Drawdowns

KARS vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, roughly equal to the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and HAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KARSHAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.85%

-65.98%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.86%

-18.64%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-40.96%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.85%

-63.12%

-1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.65%

-36.14%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-31.60%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

6.19%

-2.50%

Volatility

KARS vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) is 11.02%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a volatility of 13.79%. This indicates that KARS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KARSHAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

13.79%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.05%

23.81%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

30.37%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.93%

31.99%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.38%

31.84%

-2.46%

KARS vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

KARS vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison

KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than HAIL's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
1.56%2.00%2.98%2.62%2.09%1.36%0.52%1.17%2.54%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.17%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


KARS and HAIL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIL has higher volatility (13.79%) compared to KARS (11.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KARS dropped -64.85% vs HAIL's -65.98%.

On 5-year performance, KARS leads with -3.92% vs -6.86% for HAIL. On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, KARS has been the lower-risk option at 11.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KARS has performed better with a -3.92% return vs -6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.17% for KARS.

KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while HAIL is Global Equities. KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.45% for HAIL.

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KARS and HAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer