VYM vs. ONEQ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.70%/yr vs 19.36%/yr for ONEQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.

Performance

VYM vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 11.70%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.36% annualized return.

VYM

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 10.58%
• 1Y: 24.30%
• 3Y*: 17.89%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

ONEQ

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 6M: 10.74%
• 1Y: 33.89%
• 3Y*: 26.07%
• 5Y*: 14.42%
• 10Y*: 19.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF	10.82%	15.42%	17.60%	6.57%	-0.43%	26.20%	1.15%	24.06%	-5.92%	16.42%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	12.15%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and ONEQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between VYM and ONEQ has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VYM vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VYM	ONEQ
Financial Services	20.5%	3.1%
Technology	17.7%	50.8%
Healthcare	12.2%	5.1%
Industrials	12.1%	2.9%
Energy	9.8%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	13.3%
Utilities	5.7%	0.9%
Communication Services	3.5%	16.7%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.0%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.6%

Return for Risk

VYM vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM

VYM Risk / Return Rank: 80
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VYM	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.06	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.68	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.36	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	2.69	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	10.57	+3.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VYM vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VYM	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.06	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.65	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.89	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.64	-0.14

Drawdowns

VYM vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	VYM	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.98%	-55.09%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	-12.64%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.46%	-24.09%	+9.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.84%	-35.23%	+19.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.21%	-35.23%	+0.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-4.27%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.19%	-7.95%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	3.22%	-1.43%

Volatility

VYM vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.82%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VYM	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	5.86%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	12.74%	-5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.35%	16.58%	-6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.98%	22.22%	-8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	21.76%	-5.41%

VYM vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VYM vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than ONEQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.69%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF	2.22%	2.44%	2.74%	3.12%	3.01%	2.76%	3.18%	3.03%	3.40%	2.80%	2.91%	3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VYM and ONEQ in my portfolio?

VYM and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VYM or ONEQ?

ONEQ has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to VYM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

Which ETF is better, VYM or ONEQ?

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.36% vs 11.70% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VYM or ONEQ?

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.36% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VYM or ONEQ?

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VYM or ONEQ?

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.69% for ONEQ.

What is the main difference between VYM and ONEQ?

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.21% for ONEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.