PortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. FNCMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and FNCMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

ONEQ vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

800.00%900.00%1,000.00%1,100.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,055.53%
926.15%
ONEQ
FNCMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ONEQ:

0.39

FNCMX:

0.40

Sortino Ratio

ONEQ:

0.72

FNCMX:

0.73

Omega Ratio

ONEQ:

1.10

FNCMX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ONEQ:

0.42

FNCMX:

0.42

Martin Ratio

ONEQ:

1.42

FNCMX:

1.45

Ulcer Index

ONEQ:

7.07%

FNCMX:

7.06%

Daily Std Dev

ONEQ:

25.69%

FNCMX:

25.71%

Max Drawdown

ONEQ:

-55.09%

FNCMX:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

ONEQ:

-13.46%

FNCMX:

-13.39%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ONEQ having a -9.62% return and FNCMX slightly higher at -9.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ONEQ having a 14.46% annualized return and FNCMX not far behind at 13.76%.


ONEQ

YTD

-9.62%

1M

0.86%

6M

-6.19%

1Y

11.87%

5Y*

16.37%

10Y*

14.46%

FNCMX

YTD

-9.52%

1M

0.85%

6M

-5.99%

1Y

12.11%

5Y*

16.22%

10Y*

13.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ONEQ vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FNCMX: current value is 0.29%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FNCMX: 0.29%
Expense ratio chart for ONEQ: current value is 0.21%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ONEQ: 0.21%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ONEQ vs. FNCMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ONEQ is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNCMX is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNCMX is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ONEQ vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ONEQ, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
ONEQ: 0.39
FNCMX: 0.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for ONEQ, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
ONEQ: 0.72
FNCMX: 0.73
The chart of Omega ratio for ONEQ, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
ONEQ: 1.10
FNCMX: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for ONEQ, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
ONEQ: 0.42
FNCMX: 0.42
The chart of Martin ratio for ONEQ, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
ONEQ: 1.42
FNCMX: 1.45

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.39
0.40
ONEQ
FNCMX

Dividends

ONEQ vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than FNCMX's 0.67% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ONEQ
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock
0.69%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%1.64%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%1.19%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.67%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%0.97%0.94%0.70%0.91%0.89%0.80%

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.46%
-13.39%
ONEQ
FNCMX

Volatility

ONEQ vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) have volatilities of 17.00% and 16.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.00%
16.98%
ONEQ
FNCMX