PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEQ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.82%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.


ONEQ

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.62%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
35.46%
3Y*
25.51%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
19.82%

VOO

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.52%
YTD
10.33%
6M
11.16%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
14.28%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.33%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.91

The correlation between ONEQ and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEQ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEQ
VOO

Technology

54.3%
35.6%

Communication Services

15.4%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
10.1%

Healthcare

4.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.9%

Financial Services

2.9%
11.6%

Industrials

2.9%
8.0%

Basic Materials

0.9%
1.8%

Utilities

0.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.9%

Energy

0.5%
3.5%

Technology

ONEQ
54.3%
VOO
35.6%

Communication Services

ONEQ
15.4%
VOO
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEQ
12.7%
VOO
10.1%

Healthcare

ONEQ
4.7%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

ONEQ
4.4%
VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

ONEQ
2.9%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

ONEQ
2.9%
VOO
8.0%

Basic Materials

ONEQ
0.9%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

ONEQ
0.8%
VOO
2.8%

Real Estate

ONEQ
0.6%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

ONEQ
0.5%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEQVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.93

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

13.26

-2.44

ONEQ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-33.99%

-21.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-8.90%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-18.69%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-24.52%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-33.99%

-1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.22%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-3.68%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

1.97%

+1.32%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.47%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

4.47%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

9.67%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

12.34%

+4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

16.90%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

18.05%

+3.75%

ONEQ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEQ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.68%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ONEQ and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEQ has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to VOO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.82% vs 15.65% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.68% for ONEQ.

ONEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer