ONEQ vs. VOO
ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ returned 19.82%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEQ charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
ONEQ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.82%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.
ONEQ
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 35.46%
- 3Y*
- 25.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
ONEQ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 14.28% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 22.11% | 44.87% | 38.01% | -3.18% | 29.29% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.33% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEQ and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ONEQ and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEQ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEQ
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
ONEQ
VOO
Communication Services
ONEQ
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
ONEQ
VOO
Healthcare
ONEQ
VOO
Consumer Defensive
ONEQ
VOO
Financial Services
ONEQ
VOO
Industrials
ONEQ
VOO
Basic Materials
ONEQ
VOO
Utilities
ONEQ
VOO
Real Estate
ONEQ
VOO
Energy
ONEQ
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEQ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ONEQ
VOO
ONEQ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEQ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.93 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.82 | 13.26 | -2.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEQ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEQ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.09% | -33.99% | -21.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | -8.90% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.09% | -18.69% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.23% | -24.52% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | -33.99% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -1.22% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -3.68% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 1.97% | +1.32% |
Volatility
ONEQ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.47%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEQ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 4.47% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 9.67% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | 12.34% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 16.90% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 18.05% | +3.75% |
ONEQ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEQ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.68% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ONEQ and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ONEQ has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to VOO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.82% vs 15.65% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.68% for ONEQ.
ONEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEQ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer